View Full Version: Gay Marriage Ban Passed in Virginia

stars >>LGBT Issues in the News >>Gay Marriage Ban Passed in Virginia


<< Prev | Next >>

Tabitha- 02-08-2005
Gay Marriage Ban Passed in Virginia
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8400-2005Feb8.html Text of the Article: Va. House Passes Gay Marriage Ban By Bob Lewis Associated Press Tuesday, February 8, 2005; 4:35 PM RICHMOND -- The House of Delegates passed a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage Tuesday, despite a warning from the state's first openly gay legislator that the measure will one day shame the state as slavery and racial segregation laws did. The House voted 78-18 to complete passage of a resolution similar to one the Senate easily passed on Monday. "Today is one of those moments for which we shall one day be ashamed," said Del. Adam P. Ebbin, D-Alexandria, elected in 2003 by voters who knew he was gay. "I cannot stand by as this body continues to use gays and lesbians as scapegoats." He likened them to slavery, the forced Trail of Tears migration for Indians, lynchings, anti-miscegenation laws and Massive Resistance, Virginia's official effort to thwart court-ordered public school desegregation. "You may argue that these are different, but I would say that discrimination is discrimination is discrimination," Ebbin said. Supporters of the amendment contend it is vital to preserving marriage applying uniquely to one woman and one man and warding off court rulings such as one in Massachusetts which make gay marriage legal. "If we do not act today, marriage as we know it will be redefined by the judicial process," said Del. Kathy J. Byron, R-Campbell County. The House rejected an amendment by Del. James M. Scott, D-Fairfax County, that would have left the ban against gay marriage intact but eliminate provisions that would also prohibit civil unions or contractual agreements between two people of the same sex that approximate the privileges of marriage. The House resolution by differs slightly from the version passed on a 30-10 vote in the Senate, so negotiators from the House and Senate will have to reconcile the differences. The lopsided House vote on the most contentious moral issue of the session came nearly 10 months before all 100 House seats are up for election. It also puts Virginia on track to follow 11 states where voters last year ratified gay marriage bans to their constitutions. Virginia voters, however, could vote on the measure no sooner than November of 2006. To amend Virginia's constitution, a resolution must pass the General Assembly twice with a legislative election in between before it is put to a statewide referendum. © 2005 The Associated Press

CoCo- 02-09-2005

After reading the article below, I understand the talk in the Queer Underground about potential action this June... To combat this quickly spreading virus of homophobia, it has been proposed that perhaps in the month of June, Pride Month (FYI), should be designated Pink Triangle Month, with all of LGBTQA peoples wearing Nazi-inspired pink triangles to prove just how many of us there are and that we are everywhere in American society... I'll keep my ear to the ground. Virginia's Senate Monday voted 30-10 in favor of a proposed amendment to the state constitution to ban same-sex marriage. During an intense debate on the issue opponents of the measure likened it to the Nazis' treatment of Jews. "There is nothing ennobling about Senate Joint Resolution 337. It is xenophobia that led to the rise of Nazism in Germany and fascism in Italy. It is homophobia that brings us to this place in time today," said Mamie E. Locke (D-Hampton). Sen. Janet Howell (D-Fairfax County) went further, saying Virginia has begun stigmatizing people because of their sexuality just as the Nazis did. Jews, she said, were required in concentration camps to wear yellow patches; political prisoners wore red ones; and homosexuals got pink. "First, there were small infringements on rights, infringements perpetrated by elected representatives (who said) that's what the people want. Some religious leaders participated, misusing Biblical text to justify their deeds," Howell said. "In Virginia today, we do not require pink triangles. We stigmatize and marginalize people in other ways as we go down a path that we don't know where it will end," she said. The amendment's Senate sponsor, Sen. Stephen D. Newman (R-Lynchburg) said protecting traditional is nothing like Nazism. Newman said that without the measure, Virginia could be forced to honor gay marriages established in states where gay marriages are legal such as Massachusetts. But, Sen. Kenneth Cuccinelli (R-Fairfax County) said there was nothing wrong with discriminating against gays. Cuccinelli, noting that homosexuality was illegal for most of Virginia's history until the U.S. Supreme Court forced the state to get rid of the law denounced what he called "the tyranny of judges". A similar amendment proposal is before the House where it is also expected to win overwhelmingly

Forumer™ is Voted #1 Free Forum Hosting provider
Build your own community today with the largest message board hosting company.